September 29, 2005

DeLay Indicted

 

Republican Leader

Tom DeLay Indicted

Tom DeLay was indicted in Texas today in a campaign finance scandal. He was indicted on the charge of consipracy along with two associates. This indictment is not related to the Jack Abramoff scandals which DeLay is also tightly aligned with.

A Texas grand jury on Wednesday charged Rep.Tom DeLay and two political associates with conspiracy in a campaign finance scheme, an indictment that could force him to step down as House majority leader.

DeLay attorney Steve Brittain said DeLay was accused of a criminal conspiracy along with two associates, John Colyandro, former executive director of a Texas political action committee formed by DeLay, and Jim Ellis, who heads DeLay's national political committee.

The indictment against the second-ranking, and most assertive Republican leader came on the final day of the grand jury's term. It followed earlier indictments of a state political action committee founded by DeLay and three of his political associates.

The grand jury action is expected to have immediate consequences in the House, where DeLay is largely responsible for winning passage of the Republican legislative program. House Republican Party rules require leaders who are indicted to temporarily step aside from their leadership posts.

Senator Bill Frist - Republican Majority Leader - Tennessee -  is also under investigation for selling stock in his family's hospital just before the price fell.

Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr., said, "Representative DeLay wields tremendous power in Congress.  He rules the Republican House with an iron fist. But as the old saying warns, 'power corrupts but absolute power corrupts absolutely". "DeLays indictment proves that no one, no matter how powerful, is above the law.  DeLay should resign his office for the good of Congress and the country", Jackson concluded.

CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK

 

Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 01:37:59 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

September 28, 2005

Ethan Thomas

The Quiet Before The Storm

 

"Giving all honor, thanks and praises to God for courage and wisdom, this is a very important rally. I'd like to thank you for allowing me to share my thoughts, feelings and concerns regarding a tremendous problem that we are currently facing. This problem is universal, transcending race, economic background, religion, and culture, and this problem is none other than the current administration which has set up shop in the White House.

In fact, I'd like to take some of these cats on a field trip. I want to get big yellow buses with no air conditioner and no seatbelts and round up Bill O'Reilly, Pat Buchanan, Trent Lott, Sean Hannity, Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Bush Jr. and Bush Sr., John Ashcroft, Giuliani, Ed Gillespie, Katherine Harris, that little bow-tied Tucker Carlson and any other right-wing conservative Republicans I can think of, and take them all on a trip to the 'hood. Not to do no 30-minute documentary. I mean, I want to drop them off and leave them there, let them become one with the other side of the tracks, get them four mouths to feed and no welfare, have scare tactics run through them like a laxative, criticizing them for needing assistance.

I'd show them working families that make too much to receive welfare but not enough to make ends meet. I'd employ them with jobs with little security, let them know how it feels to be an employee at will, able to be fired at the drop of a hat. I'd take away their opportunities, then try their children as adults, sending their 13-year-old babies to life in prison. I'd sell them dreams of hopelessness while spoon-feeding their young with a daily dose of inferior education. I'd tell them no child shall be left behind, then take more money out of their schools, tell them to show and prove themselves on standardized exams testing their knowledge on things that they haven't been taught, and then I'd call them inferior.

I'd soak into their interior notions of endless possibilities. I'd paint pictures of assisted productivity if they only agreed to be all they can be, dress them up with fatigues and boots with promises of pots of gold at the end of rainbows, free education to waste terrain on those who finish their bid. Then I'd close the lid on that barrel of fool's gold by starting a war, sending their children into the midst of a hostile situation, and while they're worried about their babies being murdered and slain in foreign lands, I'd grace them with the pain of being sick and unable to get medicine.

Give them health benefits that barely cover the common cold. John Q. would become their reality as HMOs introduce them to the world of inferior care, filling their lungs with inadequate air, penny pinching at the expense of patients, doctors practicing medicine in an intricate web of rationing and regulations. Patients wander the maze of managed bureaucracy, costs rise and quality quickly deteriorates, but they say that managed care is cheaper. They'll say that free choice in medicine will defeat the overall productivity, and as co-payments are steadily rising, I'll make their grandparents have to choose between buying their medicine and paying their rent.

Then I'd feed them hypocritical lines of being pro-life as the only Christian way to be. Then very contradictingly, I'd fight for the spread of the death penalty, as if thou shall not kill applies to babies but not to criminals.

Then I'd introduce them to those sworn to protect and serve, creating a curb in their trust in the law. I'd show them the nightsticks and plungers, the pepper spray and stun guns, the mace and magnums that they'd soon become acquainted with, the shakedowns and illegal search and seizures, the planted evidence, being stopped for no reason. Harassment ain't even the half of it. Forty-one shots to two raised hands, cell phones and wallets that are confused with illegal contrabands. I'd introduce them to pigs who love making their guns click like wine glasses. Everlasting targets surrounded by bullets, making them a walking bull's eye, a living piñata, held at the mercy of police brutality, and then we'll see if they finally weren't aware of the truth, if their eyes weren't finally open like a box of Pandora.

I'd show them how the other side of the tracks carries the weight of the world on our shoulders and how society seems to be holding us down with the force of a boulder. The bird of democracy flew the coop back in Florida. See, for some, and justice comes in packs like wolves in sheep's clothing. T.K.O.'d by the right hooks of life, many are left staggering under the weight of the day, leaning against the ropes of hope. When your dreams have fallen on barren ground, it becomes difficult to keep pushing yourself forward like a train, administering pain like a doctor with a needle, their sequels continue more lethal than injections.

They keep telling us all is equal. I'd tell them that instead of giving tax breaks to the rich, financing corporate mergers and leading us into unnecessary wars and under-table dealings with Enron and Halliburton, maybe they can work on making society more peaceful. Instead, they take more and more money out of inner city schools, give up on the idea of rehabilitation and build more prisons for poor people. With unemployment continuing to rise like a deficit, it's no wonder why so many think that crime pays.

Maybe this trip will make them see the error of their ways. Or maybe next time, we'll just all get out and vote. And as far as their stay in the White House, tell them that numbered are their days."

 

Ethan Thomas

September 24, 2005

Washington D.C.

 

CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK

 

Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 08:34:39 | Permanent Link | Comments (2) |

September 26, 2005

Living Well,.....

 
 
 
 
The Water Bowl
 
 
A man and his dog were walking along a road. The man was enjoying the scenery, when it suddenly occurred to him that he was dead.
 
He remembered dying, and that the dog walking beside him had been dead for years. He wondered where the road was leading them.
 
After a while, they came to a high, white stone wall along one side of the road. It looked like fine marble.
 
At the top of a long hill, it was broken by a tall arch that glowed in the sunlight.
 
When he was standing before it he saw a magnificent gate in the arch that looked like mother-of-pearl, and the street that led to the gate looked like pure gold. He and the dog walked toward the gate, and as he got closer, he saw a man at a desk to one side.
 
When he was close enough, he called out, "Excuse me, where are we?"
 
"This is Heaven, sir," the man answered.
 
"Wow! Would you happen to have some water?" the man asked.
 
"Of course, sir. Come right in, and I'll have some ice water brought right up."
 
The man gestured, and the gate began to open.
 
"Can my friend," gesturing toward his dog, "come in, too?" the traveler asked.
 
"I'm sorry, sir, but we don't accept pets."
 
The man thought a moment and then turned back toward the road and continued the way he had been going with his dog.
 
After another long walk, and at the top of another long hill, he came to a dirt road leading through a farm gate that looked as if it had never been closed.
 
There was no fence.
 
As he approached the gate, he saw a man inside, leaning against a tree and reading a book.
 
"Excuse me!" he called to the man. "Do you have any water?"
 
"Yeah, sure, there's a pump over there, come on in."
 
"How about my friend here?" the traveler gestured to the dog.
 
"There should be a bowl by the pump."
 
They went through the gate, and sure enough, there was an old-fashioned hand pump with a bowl beside it.
 
The traveler filled the water bowl and took a long drink himself, then he gave some to the dog.
 
When they were full, he and the dog walked back toward the man who was standing by the tree.
 
"What do you call this place?" the traveler asked.
 
"This is Heaven," he answered.
 
"Well, that's confusing," the traveler said. "The man down the road said that was Heaven, too."
 
"Oh, you mean the place with the gold street and pearly gates? Nope. That's hell."
 
"Doesn't it make you mad for them to use your name like that?"
 
"No, we're just happy that they screen out the folks who would leave their best friends behind."
 
 
 
Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 14:45:13 | Permanent Link | Comments (1) |

September 24, 2005

The March On Washington

 
Americans Demand Justice:
 
 - Congress Notified -
 
The Bush Administration:
 
 GUILTY
 
 

On Saturday, September 24, hundreds of thousands of Americans from all walks of life came together in Washington, DC to call on Congress and Bush to end the war in Iraq and bring our troops home now.

When Americans marched against this war before it began, the Bush administration called it a "focus group." Now that "focus group" represents the majority of the American public, who in all the most recent polls are saying this war was a mistake, it's unwinnable, it makes us less safe at home and it should end now.

It's time for both the White House and Congress to listen to the American people. There are many reasons why Americans marched on Washington on September 24th. Here are but a few:

We marched because we are distressed over the continued war in Iraq, an unprovoked, unnecessary war that has cost the lives of tens of thousands of Iraqis and nearly 2,000 US soldiers. We grieve for those families who have already lost loved ones in this war, and we want to stop other families from suffering such painful losses.

We marched because we will hold George Bush accountable for dragging us into this war on false pretenses. The September 11 Commission officially acknowledged that Iraq was not involved in the terrorist attacks on our nation, and the U.S. military gave up its search for Iraqi weapons of mass destruction because they don't exist.

We marched because we support our troops, and we are convinced that the best way to show that support is to bring them home now and fully attend to their economic, physical, and psychological needs upon their return.

We marched because we're convinced that we can't afford to continue spending over a billion dollars a week on this unwinnable war, especially in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Our tax dollars should be channeled away from war and destruction and into rebuilding the Gulf Coast, rebuilding Iraq, and investing in our nation's healthcare, schools and infrastructure.

We marched because we're appalled by the war profiteering of companies such as Halliburton and Bechtel. We believe the Iraqis should rebuild their own country. And we want to stop the corrupt practice of awarding lucrative contracts to US companies with close government ties, as we have done in Iraq and are now repeating in the Gulf Coast.

We marched because we want to seriously address our nation's addiction to oil. We see our ruinous policies in the Middle East and the global warming-induced fury of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita as consequences of an oiligarchy that must be replaced by an economy based on conservation, efficiency and clean, renewable sources of energy.

We marched because our government is building 14 permanent bases in Iraq. Our military bases in Saudi Arabia were one of the reasons given by Al Qaeda for the September 11 attacks. We should not provoke new attacks against us by maintaining an ongoing military presence in the Middle East.

We marched because we're convinced that the war in Iraq is endangering our security. It is inflaming anti-American sentiment all over the world, it has turned Iraq into a terrorist training ground and it has actually increased the ranks of terrorist groups. It has also diverted attention and resources from capturing and bringing to justice those, including members of the Bush Administration, who conspired the attack of September 11. As Ralph Nadar said in his speech: "The Bush Administration is the most corrupt administration in the entire history of the United States." And as former Attorney General Ramsey Clark said: "The Bush Administration must be Impeached Now."

We marched because the war in Iraq is undermining the capacity of the US military. The military has been unable to reach its recruiting goals for months now, because young people don't want to be sent off to fight in a war they don't believe in. And as we have seen in the case of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, sending a significant portion of our National Guard troops and heavy equipment to Iraq has undermined our capacity to respond to emergencies here at home.

We marched because our presence in Iraqi is not helping the Iraqis. The US troops are not providing security to Iraqis - in fact more than 200 Iraqis died in the past two weeks alone. The US troops are not preventing a civil war, but provoking the insurgency and increasing the violence. We believe the Iraqi people would have a better chance of encouraging disenfranchised Sunnis to join the government and bring peace to their beleaguered nation if the US troops withdrew.

We marched because there are many indications that the Iraqis want us to leave. Polls taken just before the Iraqi election in January showed that a majority of both Sunnis and Shiites said U.S. forces should leave. In fact, one-third of the elected officials signed a letter calling for the withdrawal of foreign troops, and the Iraqi Sovereignty Committee of the National Assembly recently issued a report saying that Iraqi sovereignty was hampered by foreign forces and calling for a timetable for their withdrawal. And in June of this year, one million Iraqis - mostly Shiites - signed a petition calling for an end to the occupation.

We marched because we don't want to see our nation ever again engage in an unprovoked, pre-emptive war. We want our government to adhere to international law and to use force as an absolute last resort. We want to see our nation embrace the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, including the obligations of the nuclear powers themselves to disarm, since this is the only way we will truly rid the world of the dangers of weapons of mass destruction.

The Americans in Washington on September 24th and across the nation shall continue to speak loud and clear, reflecting the sentiments of our great Nation. It's too bad our government refused to listen to We, the People before invading Iraq. It's time they listen now. Nothing shall stop the Power of the American People until Bush resigns or is Impeached and his administration is held accountable for their crimes against humanity.

Congress has heretofore been officially notified by the American People.

 

CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK

 

Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 12:14:46 | Permanent Link | Comments (2) |

September 22, 2005

The Words and Wisdom of President Dwight D. Eisenhower

 

THE WARNING

Military-Industrial Complex

Speech,

Dwight D. Eisenhower

1961

My fellow Americans:

Three days from now, after half a century in the service of our country, I shall lay down the responsibilities of office as, in traditional and solemn ceremony, the authority of the Presidency is vested in my successor.

This evening I come to you with a message of leave-taking and farewell, and to share a few final thoughts with you, my countrymen.

Like every other citizen, I wish the new President, and all who will labor with him, Godspeed. I pray that the coming years will be blessed with peace and prosperity for all.

Our people expect their President and the Congress to find essential agreement on issues of great moment, the wise resolution of which will better shape the future of the Nation.

My own relations with the Congress, which began on a remote and tenuous basis when, long ago, a member of the Senate appointed me to West Point, have since ranged to the intimate during the war and immediate post-war period, and, finally, to the mutually interdependent during these past eight years.

In this final relationship, the Congress and the Administration have, on most vital issues, cooperated well, to serve the national good rather than mere partisanship, and so have assured that the business of the Nation should go forward. So, my official relationship with the Congress ends in a feeling, on my part, of gratitude that we have been able to do so much together.

II.

We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars among great nations. Three of these involved our own country. Despite these holocausts America is today the strongest, the most influential and most productive nation in the world. Understandably proud of this pre-eminence, we yet realize that America's leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment.

III.

Throughout America's adventure in free government, our basic purposes have been to keep the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and among nations. To strive for less would be unworthy of a free and religious people. Any failure traceable to arrogance, or our lack of comprehension or readiness to sacrifice would inflict upon us grievous hurt both at home and abroad.

Progress toward these noble goals is persistently threatened by the conflict now engulfing the world. It commands our whole attention, absorbs our very beings. We face a hostile ideology -- global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger is poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully, there is called for, not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of crisis, but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely, and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle -- with liberty the stake. Only thus shall we remain, despite every provocation, on our charted course toward permanent peace and human betterment.

Crises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small, there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research -- these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we wish to travel.

But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs -- balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage -- balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between actions of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.

The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their government have, in the main, understood these truths and have responded to them well, in the face of stress and threat. But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. I mention two only.

IV.

A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present

  • and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientifictechnological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system -- ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

V.

Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society's future, we -- you and I, and our government -- must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.

VI.

Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.

Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.

Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose differences, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment. As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war -- as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years -- I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight.

Happily, I can say that war has been avoided. Steady progress toward our ultimate goal has been made. But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizen, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along that road.

VII.

So -- in this my last good night to you as your President -- I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace. I trust that in that service you find some things worthy; as for the rest of it, I know you will find ways to improve performance in the future.

You and I -- my fellow citizens -- need to be strong in our faith that all nations, under God, will reach the goal of peace with justice. May we be ever unswerving in devotion to principle, confident but humble with power, diligent in pursuit of the Nation's great goals.

To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America's prayerful and continuing aspiration:

We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love.

 

CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK

 

Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 02:26:51 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

The Enemy From Within - Part III

 

THE ENEMY FROM WITHIN

 

Part III of V

 

PTSD

 

POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER

 

 AND THE

 

 CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

 

BY DAVID FRIEDMAN

 

 

We all have it. The capacity to hate, the capacity for anger.  It is born out of chaos, and it requires years of experiences with comments made in anger, actions created by hateful reactions, people we care about hurt before we learn to control this enemy.  Some of us will never learn.  Some of us will never be in a position to see what the passion that comes in anger can do to another human being.  

 

The worst chaos imaginable, WAR, has the power to bring this anger and hate to a place where it can no longer be controlled, no matter how strong we are.  And the strongest of us, when the time for "hating the enemy" is over, in many instances turn our anger on ourselves, for what we have become – for what it was that we allowed to control us.

 

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a complex health condition that can develop in response to a traumatic experience – a life-threatening or extremely distressing situation that causes a person to feel intense fear, horror or a sense of helplessness.

 

Soldiers returning from combat in Iraq face a high risk of suffering from PTSD, due to the unprecedented need for vigilance, not only regarding their own safety, but also for the safety of civilians in the midst of non-stop guerilla warfare.

 

If the soldiers who suffer from PTSD are not given the care they need, if they are not given the time and the calm places in which to heal, they will be driven deeper into their anger, and eventually pushed over the edge. 

 

A crime against humanity, and sadly, the worst crime of all for the citizens of this country who continue to support war, for it is against those who have made the sacrifice to defend us, who have trusted their leadership to respect them because of the significance of that sacrifice.   They have been, and continue to be, let down and disrespected at every level.

 

Where is the leadership that understands the significance of what these soldiers have given???  More importantly, when will the people of this country see that the sacrifice hasn't been given, it has been taken, by leaders who believe they deserve complete servitude; that our soldiers give up all humanity when they VOLUNTEER to defend what our constitution stands for. 

 

There is nothing worse than blind indifference to the pain of those who give all that they have for lies; those who know that they cannot get out of the madness without the help of people who just can't wake up to see the anguish our soldiers are in.  This sense of violation is the final straw that will push these soldiers over the edge.  When they reach out for help and their leaders tell them they are "malingering;" they need to "get back to the front and back into battle to keep the adrenalin flowing," to cure their lack of confidence, or the people they count on will not listen when they try to express their concerns, the people they reach out to are disregarding the needs of fellow human beings. 

 

CRIMES… we are all complicit until we see war for what it is, and take a stand to stop the madness. 

 

Where are the leaders?  When will those responsible be held accountable for what they have done, and continue to do, in the name of an illusion? 

 

These leaders have not been at Ft. Stewart, Georgia.  The 3rd Infantry Division has a history of ensuring that every soldier is "in the fight" regardless of what the fight does to the soldier.  The popular creed these days seems to be "Mission First.  Take care of the soldiers by completing the mission, at all cost.  We'll get more soldiers.  They're just kids, a dime a dozen.  They're just fathers, mothers, sons, and daughters.  We can throw them away.  Oil matters, egos matter, the illusion of leadership matters, POWER, CONTROL, not letting anyone see the incompetence, all matter more than the humanity of our soldiers."  THIS.. is leadership????? 

 

At Ft. Stewart, soldiers must go to war, no matter what their humanity says differently. 

 

One soldier requested compassionate reassignment because a brother, their only sibling, was dying.  The command of Ft. Stewart turned down this request, citing that "105% of all military personnel were needed in Iraq, so no compassionate reassignments were being considered."  It took months of letters, hounding the administration, and this soldier deployed.  Finally, months into the deployment this soldier received word that they had been given their reassignment.  By this time, it was not much longer before they redeployed home.  Why do we have to apply that much pressure to get a "leader" to do the right thing? 

 

Soldiers on medical profile were treated as "malingering," or came face to face with a physician who was willing to tear up medical profiles and re-write them to show that soldiers who had never received treatment for their conditions had miraculously become deployable. 

 

One of the soldiers at Ft. Stewart was on medical profile for a condition that caused him to be deaf.  He had his records, and was scheduled to report for treatment and a medical discharge.  One night, this young soldier was wakened by his sergeant barreling into his barracks room ordering him to get up and get his equipment.  He would be deploying with his unit, or he would face 11 years in jail.  In the night, hearing impaired, and young, what is a soldier to do?

 

A soldier attempted suicide on the morning of deployment.  For months after his return from Iraq, this soldier requested treatment from the mental health counselors.  His commanders refused to listen, saying that he was "malingering."  Rather than give him the help he needed, and asked for, they threatened him, abused him emotionally, and the abuse took its toll.  He was taken to a local hospital, but the command didn't want his story to be told, so they hastily moved him to the Army hospital, refusing entry to his spouse.  He went AWOL, and then returned after his Rear Detachment commander made promises of help. When the mental health counselors informed his commander that this soldier required treatment under their care for at least 5 weeks, the commander ignored the recommendation and sent this soldier to Iraq, back to the same command that disregarded his health to begin with. 

 

On the night before his deployment, another Ft. Stewart soldier grabbed a bottle of prescription medication and a gun.  He got into his vehicle, drove off post to a highway not far away, pulled over to the side of the road and swallowed the pills in the bottle.  As the pills began to take effect, this soldier, a veteran of the invasion, then got out of his vehicle with his gun and walked along the edge of the highway away from his car.  The medication worked, in more ways than one, and he passed out along the side of the road before he could use the gun. 

 

This soldier was placed in the Psych unit of the Army hospital, where he was observed throughout the following week.  Doctors in the Psych unit told him that he was "malingering" and threatened with jail time.  He was ordered to deploy, and was sent to Iraq less than two weeks after he had attempted suicide.  Why did he take the pills?  He was scheduled to leave the military that same month, but the Army stop/lossed him, and rather than getting out, he was looking forward to another year and 4 months in combat, never having had his emotional condition addressed. 

 

There are uncounted cases of these stories on Ft. Stewart.  Doctors and commanders, self-proclaimed leaders who care about their soldiers, give the illusion, but actions present a different perspective.  Soldiers have gone AWOL, 12 from one unit, and have stayed away for so long they were dropped from the rolls.  Where is the accounting?  How many more have suffered that will never be known, because leaders chose to hide the truth, to cover the facts, to distort reality? 

 

Many in America want to know why more soldiers don't speak out against war, and the atrocities from it, if indeed they exist.  They do exist, and soldiers are speaking.  Their actions are telling us so much more than their words ever could.  But no one can hear because their voices are being muffled by those who claim to lead them. No one can hear because the outcry of these soldiers has been turned off with rhetoric, documents lost and access to the installations cut off for civilians who could make a difference if they knew the truth. 

 

PTSD manifests itself in so many ways.  Every aspect displays itself in the emotional turmoil that exists within each soldier.  But just as a soldier is an individual, the outward demonstrations of PTSD are as well.  There are many victims when a soldier suffers. 

 

On a small grassy median just in front of the Ft. Stewart PX complex, was a memorial that stood for 2 months.  One hundred and ninety one small blue pinwheels spun in the breezes during the spring months.  On a poster behind the pinwheels words read, "A memorial to the 191 confirmed cases of child abuse in the 3rd ID, on Ft. Stewart and Hunter Army Airfield, in the last year." 

                              

 WHO KNEW??        What more needs to be said?
 
 
 
 
 
 
Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 02:11:17 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

September 20, 2005

because I tell you the truth,.....

 

"Am I therefore

 

become your enemy

 

 because I tell you the truth?"

 

by Sgt. Kevin Benderman - Conscientious Objector to War
 
 
It is an interesting question, and a thought-provoking one, from the Bible. It is one that, I believe, is the essence of why I am in jail.  The truth I told grew from my experiences in the war in Iraq.  I went there with the desire to avenge the people who died on September 11, 2001, and to keep the soldiers that I served with safe in the process.  I went as a soldier in the service of my country, never once thinking that my government would mislead me or lie to me not in order to advance the good of the country, but to fulfill a seemingly personal agenda of a few individuals. The truth that I had to tell came from meeting the people that I had been told were blood-thirsty religious fanatics who were intent on destroying my country and our way of life, and discovering that aside from a few zealots, the assertion was just not the truth.  Zealotry is a very prominent, driving force in the world, and all countries, peoples and religions have them.  Yes, there are zealots even within our highly esteemed Christianity, as evidenced by Pat Robertson calling for our government to assassinate the elected president of Venezuela.   My pointing out fanaticism from within our own government, and the lies told in order to start the slaughter of a nation that had nothing to do with the September 11 attack on our country, is why I was taken before a Kangaroo court and imprisoned as a result.  The garrison commander told the prosecutors that I was to do 18 months in prison before the investigation phase of the court martial even started.  The company commander was trying to come up with everything he could think of to smear me before they concentrated their efforts to put me in jail. 
 
I do not want to mislead anyone into thinking that I am a saint, because I have done many things in my life that are wrong and I am ashamed of doing them.  But, I decided that I was not going to add to that list by taking any further part in this war against a people that have done absolutely nothing to us. 
 
Tacitus, a Roman historian, said, "When monarchs through their bloodthirsty commanders lay waste a country, they dignify their atrocity by calling it 'making peace,'" or in this case, by calling it "spreading democracy."
 
 
We are being told that we are to continue the war in Iraq because their country needs us, and all the while our people suffer.  We continue to look outward, but isn't the truth within us?   We look to satisfy our egos by believing that we are so great that we can save others from themselves.  Isn't the truth that it is not up to us to save others, that to save them, we must leave them and face what must be saved within ourselves?
 
 
 
 
 
Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 09:21:21 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

Clinton Slams Bush

 
Clinton Launches Attack on Bush
 
 on Iraq, Katrina, Budget
 
 
Former US president Bill Clinton sharply criticised George W. Bush for the Iraq War and the handling of Hurricane Katrina, and voiced alarm at the swelling US budget deficit.

Breaking with tradition under which US presidents mute criticisms of their successors, Clinton said the Bush administration had decided to invade Iraq "virtually alone and before UN inspections were completed, with no real urgency, no evidence that there were weapons of mass destruction."

The Iraq war diverted US attention from the war on terrorism "and undermined the support that we might have had," Clinton said in an interview with an ABC's "This Week" programme.

Clinton said there had been a "heroic but so far unsuccessful" effort to put together an constitution that would be universally supported in Iraq.

The US strategy of trying to develop the Iraqi military and police so that they can cope without US support "I think is the best strategy. The problem is we may not have, in the short run, enough troops to do that," said Clinton.

On Hurricane Katrina, Clinton faulted the authorities' failure to evacuate New Orleans ahead of the storm's strike on August 29.

People with cars were able to heed the evacuation order, but many of those who were poor, disabled or elderly were left behind.

"If we really wanted to do it right, we would have had lots of buses lined up to take them out," Clinton.

He agreed that some responsibility for this lay with the local and state authorities, but pointed the finger, without naming him, at the former director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

FEMA boss Michael Brown quit in response to criticism of his handling of the Katrina disaster. He was viewed as a political appointee with no experience of disaster management or dealing with government officials.

"When James Lee Witt ran FEMA, because he had been both a local official and a federal official, he was always there early, and we always thought about that," Clinton said, referring to FEMA's head during his 1993-2001 presidency.

"But both of us came out of environments with a disproportionate number of poor people."

On the US budget, Clinton warned that the federal deficit may be coming untenable, driven by foreign wars, the post-hurricane recovery programme and tax cuts that benefitted just the richest one percent of the US population, himself included.

"What Americans need to understand is that ... every single day of the year, our government goes into the market and borrows money from other countries to finance Iraq, Afghanistan, Katrina, and our tax cuts," he said.

"We have never done this before. Never in the history of our republic have we ever financed a conflict, military conflict, by borrowing money from somewhere else."

Clinton added: "We depend on Japan, China, the United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia, and Korea primarily to basically loan us money every day of the year to cover my tax cut and these conflicts and Katrina. I don't think it makes any sense."

Copyright © 2005AFP

 

CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK

 

Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 02:43:13 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

September 19, 2005

Anti-War, Impeach Bush Movement at Full Momentum

 

Anti-War/Impeach Bush  

Now the Majority Sentiment in America

 

Unfolding developments over the past several weeks have made it clear that the September 24 demonstrations in Washington DC, San Francisco and Los Angeles will be the largest outpouring of Anti-War/Impeach Bush sentiment since the illegal invasion of Iraq in March 2003. The Anti-War/Impeach Bush movement has gained full momentum, and a successful mass mobilization on Sept. 24 can be the key element in transforming that momentum into a powerful political force.

The Impeach Bush and Anti-War sentiment in the United States has now become the majority sentiment. Polls now show that Bush's approval rating regarding Iraq has fallen to under 40 percent. The American people know that they have been lied to and they no longer believe in the propaganda that is pumped out of the White House. The reach of the Anti-War/Impeach Bush movement has become broad and deep and includes segments of the population that had never before participated in protest activities.

Huge numbers will come from every major city on the East Coast, Midwest and South - New York City, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Boston, Detroit, Chicago, Cleveland, Atlanta, Birmingham, Charlotte and elsewhere - and from many smaller cities. Gulfport, Mississippi; Eau Claire, Wisconsin; and Des Moines, Iowa are just a few of the cities organizing for this demonstration. Buses will be coming from as far as Albuquerque, New Mexico - a 28 hour drive to DC.

The September 24 Impeach Bush and Anti-War demonstration will be making a direct and vivid connection between Bush's illegal war in Iraq and its inability and refusal to meet human needs as evidenced by the government's incompetent and criminal handling of the crisis in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. It is ironic and pitiful that the Bush White House can find limitless resources to wage war in Iraq - currently about $200 million a day or 1.4 billion each week - and plan the destruction of a whole city (Fallujah) in meticulous detail, but when confronted with the need to save a city the same government showed apathy, lethargy and criminal neglect, especially when it came to working class and African American communities. Moreover, in their pursuit of "endless war" the Bush Administration in 2003 and 2004 diverted large amounts of funding slated for Louisiana hurricane and flood rescue and response efforts to the Iraq war.

The Bush Administration is also facing Indictments which have been reported to be handed down within the coming weeks. Speculation that Bush, facing charges far worse than Nixon did in WaterGate, could resign.  The majority of America has had enough of the lies and corruption of the Bush Administration and a Blank Check Congress and September 24th will be the beginning to the end of the nightmare America has suffered from since 2000 according to demonstration organizers, speakers, historians and participants.  America marches on Washington September 24th.

 

CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK

 

Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 12:59:19 | Permanent Link | Comments (1) |

September 17, 2005

Bush Must Resign or Face Impeachment

 
A Reality Check
 
 on Bush's Speech
 
 to the
 
UN World Summit
 
by Yifat Susskind
 

On September 14, George W. Bush addressed a gathering of over 170 world leaders at the UN World Summit. His speech came in the wake of international outrage against the US for its attempts to derail the Summit's original purpose, which was to make progress on reducing global poverty. Given the disconnect between the President's words and deeds, we offer the following MADRE reality check on some of Bush's more egregious comments at the World Summit.

"Either hope will spread, or violence will spread-and we must take the side of hope."

As the world's biggest arms exporter, the US has clearly taken the side of violence. On Bush's watch, US arms sales have outpaced the second-largest arms dealer (Russia) two-to-one. More than half of these weapons went to governments known for human rights abuses against civilians, such as Pakistan, Uzbekistan, and Colombia.[1]

"The terrorists must know that wherever they go, they cannot escape justice."

Oh no? While the Bush Administration has been busy killing civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq, al Qaeda has regrouped to become a more diffuse network of local units able to strike with greater frequency in multiple countries. Osama bin Laden, meanwhile, cannot be found because-as Bush famously explained-"he is hiding."[2]

"The Security Council has an opportunity to put the terrorists on notice when it votes on a resolution that condemns the incitement of terrorist acts."

The resolution, which was passed after Bush's speech, bans incitement without defining the term. It thereby gives governments a powerful instrument to silence political opponents, shut down organizations critical of their policies, and quash peaceful dissent.

"We must send a clear message to the rulers of outlaw regimes that sponsor terror and pursue weapons of mass murder: you will not be allowed to threaten the peace and stability of the world."

Apparently that prerogative is reserved for the Pentagon, which just last week updated plans for using nuclear weapons preemptively.[3] In a move that the UN Secretary General labeled "a disgrace," Bush's UN Ambassador, John Bolton, blocked a call for nuclear disarmament from the Summit's outcome document.

"Confronting our enemies is essential, and so civilized nations will continue to take the fight to the terrorists."

More bad news for the people who happen to live in the battle zone. While Bush was making this callous remark, 150 Iraqi civilians were killed in the worst single day of attacks since the 2003 US invasion.

"We are committed to the Millennium Development Goals."

This must have been news to Bolton, who tried to delete every mention of the goals from the Summit's outcome document.

"I call on all the world's nations to implement the Monterrey Consensus."

The Monterrey Consensus (named for a 2002 economic summit in Mexico) includes a commitment by rich countries to spend 0.7 percent of their national income (less than three-quarters of a percent) on development-something that the US has fought tooth and nail against and still refuses to do. In fact, the US-the word's richest country-spends less than a quarter of one percent on development (.18 percent). Bush is much more enthusiastic about the other provisions of the Monterrey Consensus: poor countries implementing political and economic reforms demanded by wealthy countries in exchange for aid and debt relief.

"Tying aid to reform is essential to eliminating poverty."

Actually, untying aid from "reforms" imposed by donor countries would go a lot farther. These "reforms" center on policies such as privatization, trade liberalization, and debt servicing, which have worsened poverty in poor countries, and resulted in a net flow of about $200 billion a year from poor to rich countries (compared to about $50 billion a year that poor countries receive in aid).[4] And while ending government corruption (to which Bush was ostensibly referring) is crucial, it is the citizens of poor countries, not rich foreign governments, who should have the power to demand accountability from their leaders.

"At the G-8 Summit at Gleneagles, Scotland, we set a clear goal: an AIDS-free generation in Africa. And I challenge every member of the United Nations to take concrete steps to achieve that goal."

Some of Bush's "concrete steps":

  • Bush demanded that African governments spend US funding exclusively on drugs patented by US companies, instead of generics (the patented drugs cost about $15,000 a year per patient compared to $350 a year for generics).[5]
  • Bush's UN Ambassador refused to allow the World Summit to "encourage pharmaceutical companies to make anti-retroviral drugs affordable and accessible in Africa."
  • Bush insists on prevention programs that promote abstinence over proven "safer sex" approaches, put stringent restrictions on condom use, and demand that groups receiving funds formally oppose abortion and prostitution.
  • Bush promised in 2003 to spend $15 billion to fight AIDS, but took most of this money from existing programs, including child vaccination initiatives-a move that The New York Times described as "forcing the babies of Africa to pay for their parents' AIDS drugs." [6]

"We've pledged to increase our funding for malaria treatment and prevention by more than $1.2 billion over the next five years."

Another lie. Only about nine percent of this is new money; the rest was slated to be spent anyway.[7] Malaria is the number one killer of African children, yet Bush is undermining international cooperation in the fight against malaria (and AIDS) by refusing to adequately fund the UN Global Fund to Fight AIIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.

"We agreed to cancel 100 percent of the debt for the world's most heavily indebted nations."

This is a frequently repeated distortion of the agreement reached by the G8 (the world's richest countries) in July 2005. Debt cancellation was offered to only a limited number of countries (18 of the 62 that need it in order to achieve the minimum standards of the Millennium Development Goals).[8] In dollar terms, the deal is worth only about $1.5 billion a year (or about 6 percent) of the $25 billion that Africa needs to achieve the MDGs.[9] And it comes with a catch: to qualify, countries must "boost private sector development" and eliminate "impediments to private investment, both domestic and foreign." These conditions are designed to bring the G8 countries more money than they write off.

"And when Iraqis complete their journey, their success will inspire others to claim their freedom, the Middle East will grow in peace and hope and liberty, and all of us will live in a safer world."

This delusion has already cost the lives of tens of thousands of Iraqis and nearly 2,000 US soldiers and pushed Iraq to the brink of becoming an Islamic state. In fact, the example of Iraq's "journey" has undermined democratic movements in the Middle East and beyond by instilling fear that "regime change" could result in foreign military occupation, mass killings, and civil war.

Bush was able to keep silent about the critical issues that his Ambassador managed to cut from the World Summit's outcome document, including provisions to strengthen the International Criminal Court, protect the environment, promote nuclear disarmament, and commit rich countries to allocating a minimum percentage of their national income to development aid. These silences are criminal for, as the President said, "The stakes are high. The lives and futures of millions of the world's poorest citizens hang in the balance."

Yifat Susskind, Associate Director of MADRE, an international women's human rights organization, has written extensively on US foreign policy, women's human rights, and international development issues. She can be reached at madre@madre.org

 [1] Frida Berrigan, "U.S. leads the world in sale of military goods," Fort Worth Star-Telegram, 11 September 2005,

[2] Tim Russet interviews President Bush on "Meet the Press," NBC News, 8 February 2004,

[3] Walter Pincus, "Pentagon Revises Nuclear Strike Plan," Washington Post, 11 September 2005.

[4] "Development Funds Moving from Poor Countries to Rich Ones, Annan Says" UN News Centre, 30 October 2003,

[5] Thalif Deen, "Tied Aid Strangling Nations, Says U.N," Inter Press Service, 6 July 2004,

[6] "Helping Poor Countries," Editorial, The New York Times, 17 February 2003.

[7] David Bryden, "Bush Overstates Africa Aid Increase," Foreign Policy in Focus, 20 July 2005

[8] "G8 Debt Relief Proposals: A First Step in the Right Direction - And a Long Way to Go," Jubilee Research, 14 June 2005

[9] Jeffrey D. Sachs, "Four Easy Pieces," The New York Times, 25 June 2005.

 

CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK

 

Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 10:09:17 | Permanent Link | Comments (1) |
1 2 3